Some interesting dilemmas of science and technology communication:

A synthesis knowledge and technology communication is actually full of dilemmas. This is especially so when the media publish news about development that has the potential to affect the quality of life, the market, and especially the entire landscape of biological resources. Such is the case with biotechnology in particular. The purpose of this article is to consolidate some of the important ideas in this field so that it can be benefited especially by young and emerging professionals involved in science and technology communication.

Weiss (Reference 1) provides an excellent bird’s-eye view of the changes in both extreme conditions, in particular the role of the media in convincing the general public of information on genetically modified organisms and their advantages or disadvantages. . Media experts also recognize the need to explain the process by which science provides answers. It is based on the basic fact that it is imperative to know the truth first and then make any inference based on other determinants of the implications. Keeping in touch with the common man is equally important in this context. The perspectives of stakeholder groups can also vary significantly according to their own circumstances and their approach to development.

Bubella et al. (2009) discuss several well-known models that guide communication strategies. Important about Basically, he says that the basis of public understanding can be contrary to the thinking of scientists. It may also be related to the depth or dissemination of information reaching the general public. It is equally important to evaluate the basis of the structure of the response to an appeal to form an opinion or to make a decision. Bubella and others have correctly explained the essential fact that it involves the necessity of going beyond personal experiences or anecdotal observations. A major determinant is also the fundamental difference between the way scientists and communicators approach research. Hence | Equally important is to evaluate the basis of the structure of the response to appeal for opinion formation or decision making. Bubella and others have correctly explained the essential fact that it involves the necessity of going beyond personal experiences or anecdotal observations. A big determinant of research by scientists and communicators | There is also a fundamental difference that exists between the way of looking at it. The deeper need is to define the process of communication with a variety of objectives and issues affecting understanding.

Another large area of ​​equal importance relates to the understanding of the phenomenon of climate change and its effects. It is clear that new insights emerge with ever-evolving models and empirical evidence. Clearly, management strategies cannot be seen in isolation from the issues of science. Management choices based on these are governed by socio-political considerations. Thus arises the purpose of an in-depth debate on the implications of the processes of ingesting extroversion. Communication on the ever-evolving dynamics and predominance of determinants must necessarily incorporate the right aspects of science, technology and management. This is not possible through skewed or alienated perspectives.